Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2013 3:05:54 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: NYer

So now the ACLU is ok with the courts using sharia law.

What will they do when a US sharia court decides a thief should have his/her hand cut off or that a gay person be executed??


29 posted on 08/17/2013 3:40:32 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Every day, another outrage. Another state CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT tossed out by a single Leftist blackrobe.

Can anyone dispute that we are no longer a republic?!!!!

30 posted on 08/17/2013 3:40:57 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Since when does a FEDERAL judge have any jurisdiction over an OKAHOMA vote of the people?


32 posted on 08/17/2013 3:42:40 PM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
They have a ban U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange page on Facebook

BAN-US-District-Judge-Vicki-Miles-LaGrange-who-supports-Sharia

and here is an interesting quote they had on it. Can anyone confirm if the Kenyan said this?


39 posted on 08/17/2013 3:56:55 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

I find it hilarious when liberals (and RINOs like fatass Christie) try to lecture conservatives about how we’re just being “paranoid” about the application of Sharia. This is ALREADY HAPPENING in Europe! “Sharia courts” effectively making rape and murder legal if you identify as Muslim.


40 posted on 08/17/2013 3:57:05 PM PDT by RB156
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

It’s about time to bring out the tar and feathers...


45 posted on 08/17/2013 4:03:56 PM PDT by Gritty (This war against Islamism is being lost because it cannot even be acknowledged- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Liberal-Socialist federal judges are garbage, pure and simple.


55 posted on 08/17/2013 4:18:06 PM PDT by righttackle44 (Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

All of the other arguments aside, what we have here is yet another example of judicial tyranny. The will of the people have been negated by a person in a black robe, and this one happens to be a liberal, black, muslim homosexual to boot! I hope an appeal can be mounted against her ruling.


62 posted on 08/17/2013 4:35:10 PM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The American judiciary: just can't destroy America fast enough.

Why? It means more power for them.

63 posted on 08/17/2013 4:35:13 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Oklahoma native educated via ghana, vassar and howard

http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/nGetInfo?jid=1641&cid=999&ctype=na&instate=na

clinton appointment 1994


66 posted on 08/17/2013 4:42:59 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; All

Other than the court’s decision essentially being a preemptive strike against the law if there were no actual cases of somebody’s constitutional rights being abridged by the law, I don’t see what the fuss is all about. Both Christians and Muslims are protected, by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, from state laws which go too far in abridging constitutional privileges and immunities.

What the states should have are recall laws which permit voters to remove and penalize bad-apple judges who use their power to attack a given religion.

So what am I overlooking?


67 posted on 08/17/2013 4:44:48 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

There is rampant ignorance all around in that rodeo——Sharia law is not religous/religion/faith related or anything of the sort. Sharia is tribal law, or more accurately tribal custom since it always is applied the way the chief says it should be. The Soddies , for example, are great at making it up as they go. It happens that Arabs/mooslims/Persians/etc. use Sharia interchangeably but note that the largest mooslim bunch, the Indonesians, just don’t mention Sharia. Sharia is not/doesn’t have to be, an integral part of islam.

If the Okies do their homework they can get this done.


68 posted on 08/17/2013 4:51:42 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
...so Shariah law CAN be used in our courts?
71 posted on 08/17/2013 5:07:31 PM PDT by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
By this judge’s interpretation, the US Constitution allows for Sheria Law to supersede US law. How the hell does that work??
75 posted on 08/17/2013 5:15:18 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
in that case, i've got a few LAWS OF MY OWN i'm going to go by!!!

we are truly screwed...

78 posted on 08/17/2013 5:18:35 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
"While the public has an interest in the will of the voters being carried out, the Court finds that the public has a more profound and long-term interest in upholding an individual's constitutional rights,"

Sharia being all constitutional and everything.

You see, if you want to live according to Christian principles, its a violation of the famous separation of church and state clause that everyone finds hidden between the lines of the constitution. But if you want to impose Sharia, thats jake.

Outlawing sharia, that violates the separation of church and state because as we understand, under sharia, the religion *is* the state.

Corruption, thy name is Democrat.

79 posted on 08/17/2013 5:19:57 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Most likely this decision was handed to the judge by
the DOJ. This has the smell of Obama all over it, you
know against the will of the people. No one was brought
up on charges or committed income tax evasion before the
16th amendment was supposedly ratified. This decision is
bunk.


84 posted on 08/17/2013 5:52:07 PM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Yeah, I do not recall some federal black robed jackass being given authority over a STATE’S sovereign laws in the Constitution.

So ignore this idiot, OK. THEY are not legislators....so do not let them write law.


87 posted on 08/17/2013 5:58:55 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Who didn’t see that one coming...with the judges we have had foisted upon us!


88 posted on 08/17/2013 5:59:30 PM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
What happens when someone who is NOT a practitioner of Sharia is accused of violating it, and is charged and convicted against his own religious and/or civic beliefs?

-PJ

89 posted on 08/17/2013 6:02:06 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson