The open-ended interpretation of Obamacare enables this.....if the law doesn't contain a particular provision, no problem. They just make it up as they go along.
Such is the case that involves the winning Oklahoma lawsuit....... The court rejected the federal governments argument that Oklahoma lacked standing to challenge the law, allowing us to proceed with this pivotal case, Were optimistic the court will recognize what states have known for months that the IRS disregarded the law by making the large employer mandate effective in Oklahoma or in any of the 33 other states without a state health care exchange.
REFERENCE Oklahoma challenged implementation of the Affordable Care Act after the IRS finalized a rule that would allow the federal government to punish large employers, including local government, with millions of dollars in tax penalties in states without state health care exchanges, which is not allowed under the health care law.
Congress provided a choice for Oklahoma and other states in implementation of the health care law, and the IRS is attempting to take that away by rule, General Pruitt said.
The administration miscalculated how many states would support this law, so now theyre using the IRS to push through provisions that Congress did not pass."
"Who, me worry? I got so much federal money stashed
offshore, me and Michele can buy this Vineyard dump
ten times over."
"And besides, I aint planning to leave office---so get over
it. I got in by voter fraud before and I'll do it again."
"What Republican Party?"