Posted on 08/14/2013 6:35:58 AM PDT by jimbo123
Soon after the 10th anniversary of the foundation bearing his name, Bill Clinton met with a small group of aides and two lawyers from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. Two weeks of interviews with Clinton Foundation executives and former employees had led the lawyers to some unsettling conclusions.
The review echoed criticism of Mr. Clinton’s early years in the White House: For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
After all the threats made by the Clintons to the NY Times to stop their criticism of Weiner over the past couple of months.
And all the Clinton threats to the NYT to write puff pieces about Huma Abedin or else.
Looks like all those threats backfired on the Clintons. All because of Weiner's weiner.
What % of their received donations are kept as “Administration Fees” by the Clinton Foundation?
Hillary has no chance of getting the nomination.
Actually, I’d be perfectly happy if the Klintoons would just go away. I don’t care what they do—I just don’t want to hear about it or think about it or talk about it.
But I know that “ain’t a-gonna” happen......
So if the Clinton Foundation runs a multiyear series of operating deficits it’s a problem. On the other hand, if the country does...
Move along, this is just the Old Gray Lady hiking her skirt up to she if she can still get a rise out of Li’l Bill. Bubba had her many ways over the years, and she enjoyed every minute of it. She’s just jealous that his attention has been given to others now that he no longer needs her.
Next episode: a mediated truce— Chelsea goes to work for the NYT, agrees to cover her mother’s presidential campaign and provide an insider’s view of the campaign for all those young working women who just love what BillEtHill want to do with government (not to mention the curtains in the oval office, oh my, have U seen them lately...what could Michelle possibly be thinking). In exchange Hill’s camp gets a 24-hour preview of all stories the NYT will run on her during the campaign.
I sure as heck hope that you are right, but to hear the media, she has a lock on it. How did you come to that conclusion?
Shouldn't that be the Bill, Hillary, Chelsea & Monica & Paula & Gennifer & [pick your favorite bimbo] Foundation?
I'm beginning to think you are right. "Satan laughing spreads his wings"...
Read the comments at the article to see how the left views the clintons.
I'm beginning to think you are right. ...and "Satan laughing spreads his wings".
She had a lock in 2008. How did that work out?
Oh, and Anthony, thank you for your Weiner if it is the cause of all this discombobulation.
Well, I know she has less than enthusiastic support over at DU so you may be right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.