[Gay State Conservative]

To me the lawyers made no difference whatsoever.The evidence,on both sides,could have been compiled by a computer and printed out for the jury.One guy was dead.The other guy's head...and face...were split wide open.The only injury the dead guy had was a single gunshot wound.A licensed physician testified that the dead guy had marijuana in his system at a level that could have affected his thinking and actions.Witnesses said that the guy in red was on the bottom getting the tar beaten out of him...by means of a concrete sidewalk.

Self defense."If the head was split,you must acquit".But unlike in the GZ case,OJ had no discernible injuries on him that might have justified him in decapitating the mother of his children.

[Sopater]

To me the lawyers made no difference whatsoever.

As for the prosecution, I have to agree. However, there are a great deal of things that the defense could have done wrong that may have cost them the case regardless of the lack of incriminating evidence and the preponderance of evidence that seemed to exonerate him. GZ needed a defense that would keep the jury focused on the facts and the evidence.