Posted on 08/08/2013 10:22:49 AM PDT by george76
Some Swiss towns plan to keep asylum-seekers away from public places such as swimming pools, playing fields and libraries, in a move human rights groups say is racist.
The curbs are aimed at preventing tensions with residents, officials say.
...
Roman Staub, mayor of the town of Menzingen, said asylum-seekers should be banned from "sensitive areas" such as the vicinity of a school. "This is certainly a very difficult area, because here asylum-seekers could meet our schoolchildren - young girls or young boys,"
...
In June voters overwhelmingly backed a controversial move to tighten asylum restrictions, amid a spike in the number of refugees in the country.
Switzerland counts one asylum-seeker for every 332 inhabitants. The European average is one asylum-seeker for every 625 inhabitants.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...
The Swiss don’t want to become the UK or Sweden..
I hope they can stick by their guns and keep their nation clean.
If the Swiss were smart, they would reject all asylum seekers.
How do these people get to Switzerland in the first place? How many borders do they have to cross to get there?
Why does any Western nation deliberately import untold thousands of poor, uneducated, often criminal Third World parasites? Does the word “racist” really have SO much power that citizens would commit national suicide to avoid it?
Any nation with a modicum of success is a sitting duck for the parasites that invade to get in on the gravy. It’s much easier to sneak into another country than it is to stand up to the corrupt despots running their own.
“Does the word “racist” really have SO much power that
citizens would commit national suicide to avoid it “.
The short answer is YES.
It looks like finally some countries are seeing the light and cracking down. There was a story yesterday about how a law recently passed in Russia requires that all illegal aliens and people who overstay their visas be rounded up and sent to camps until they can be processed to be sent back or their applications for legal status are approved.
Only the Western Nations, in the rest of world being labeled a racist would barely elicit a bored shrug.
Who’s outraged? Certainly not the people who’ll have to share the slums with these 3rd worlders.
They need to push them over the nearest border. They had to cross through Italy, Germany, France to get there. Can any of them claim to be endangered in Italy, Germany, or France?
If the Swiss don’t buck up, they are going to lose their sovereignty and once lost, its pretty tough getting it back. The generation that loses it won’t live to see it return.
The only way that you can work asylum-seekers....is to allow them to enter and then you direct them to a listed village by state standards....not allowing them to become part of some ‘clan’ or ethnic enclave in some larger city. Once they arrive in some two-cow village in the middle of nowhere...they are forced into integration, language, and say adios to their religious dedication.
Islamic figures will get huffy if you make this rule, but it really takes the steam out of this mess. You make the rule that they have to stay five years in some small village, before they can move anywhere else, and the whole game changes overnight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.