Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NEMDF

“I agree with you. There is no substitute for having sufficient life insurance. What if he had died in a car accident? She would possibly not be getting even the benefits she will receive now (without the lawsuit)”


A seasonal firefighter might have a hard time buying affordable life insurance. This would have to be disclosed to the insurer, who would put a hefty extra premium on top of the normal premium due to the larger risk that job entails.

Not knowing what his family financial situation was it’s possible (they were pretty young and maybe not financially secure) he couldn’t afford more insurance. It’s not fair to make the assumption that a firefighter could purchase a lot of insurance, even at a young age when its’ cheapest.


13 posted on 08/07/2013 10:57:46 AM PDT by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: LRoggy

In your rebuttal you miss the obvious: he didn’t have to be in that profession. It was his and her responsibility to make sure the family was provided for in case one or the other died. With both nearly 30, not 20, there’s no excuse.


15 posted on 08/07/2013 12:04:39 PM PDT by newzjunkey (bah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson