[Yosemitest]

Bookmark for REFERENCE:

About that birth certificate (which Obama refuses to produce)
Posted on April 25, 2010 by HillBuzz // Hillbuzz

One of the most ingenious things the Obama campaign did in 2008 was to nullify ALL questions about
WHY he REFUSED TO PRODUCE his birth certificate,
by stoking the “birther” conspiracy
that he was not born in the United States
and, thus, painting anyone who talked about his birth certificate as insane.

It’s CLASSIC magic trick DISTRACTION.

Whenever anyone questions WHY the current President of the United States refuses to release his ORIGINAL birth certificate,
his followers immediately launch into an Alinsky-based attack on the person who brought the matter up — attacking that person as a “birther”.

This is a remarkably effective trick, because no one ever sees the REAL reason he does not want his birth certificate released.  
The “birther” screaming and yelling keeps attention focused away from what his original birth certificate would reveal about his father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr.

In 1961, when Obama was indeed born in Hawaii, his father would have most likely be listed as “Arab”, not black, on his birth certificate.  
Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was only 1/4 black, and identified himself as a Kenyan Arab.  
According to HOW the British would have RECORDED HIM in their documents back then, BHO Sr. would have been “Arab”.

Furthermore, IF Hawaii’s birth certificates in 1961 were like our own birth certificates from Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, and New York in the 1970s,
THEN Obama’s official and original birth certificate would have been HANDWRITTEN, WITH THE RELIGION of his parents recorded under their names.  
That’s what ALL of our birth certificates say, anyway.  
”Catholic” is listed under most of our mothers’ and fathers’ names, with “Baptist” and “Episcopalian” on two of those slots.

We’ve always believed THE REASON Obama does NOT PRODUCE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE is because
his father is listed as “Arab” and “Muslim” on that form,
which is what he would have been recorded as in 1961 in Hawaii.

That cuts against the narrative
that Obama rode to the White House, which he affirmed in his 2010 census — which is that he is black.
This is how he has CHOSEN to self-identify, and it’s the TOOL HE USED to advance himself so fast through the Democrat Party.  
He even had William Ayers write two books all about his racial grievances.

None of that flies IF THE PUBLIC SEES that his father was an “Arab” “Muslim”, as recorded on that birth certificate.

The public would have a very bad reaction to this, and would look upon the Lightbringer AS A FRAUD AND LIAR.

The whole White House of cards would collapse.  
Re-election 2012 would be a non-starter.

Hence, the White House and every Democrat in office is doing everything it can to make sure Obama’s ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE NEVER SEES THE LIGHT OF DAY.

We believe IF efforts in Arizona, Georgia, and Oklahoma succeed
and they, and other states, pass legislation requiring presidential candidates to produce their original birth certificates to appear on the 2012 ballot,
there will be some sort of fire or other accident at the Hall of Records in Honolulu.  
Expect a discovery relative to that which announces Obama’s original birth certificate, on file in Hawaii, was destroyed in that fire or other mysterious accident (beneficial to the White House).
Because Obama moved around so much as a child,
and because his mother and grandmother are now dead,
the White House will announce they are unable to locate his familial copies of his original birth certificate.
Thus, the recently computer generated “Certificate of Live Birth” produced by Obama will be the ONLY DOCUMENT available for public inspection.

Obama’s narrative depends on his father being a black atheist from Kenya…a “goat herder”.

THE REASON the birth certificate will never see the light of day is
because it reveals his father to be an “Arab” “Muslim”,
and damn proud of it.

What’s happened here is
that OBAMA PROMOTED A LIE about who his father really was —
and he did this to get elected to high office.
Now in that office, he needs to do everything possible to protect and eternally perpetuate that lie, lest he lose it all.

And the main strategy for protecting the lie is TO DEMONIZE ANYONE ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT IT — which is the Alinsky Method.  
Attack anyone asking WHERE the birth certificate is and WHY it won’t be produced,
call them “birthers”, and paint them as crazy…
so that NO ONE EVER STOPS to look at the REAL reason the White House WON’T produce a simple document and end ALL controversy.

Because THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO SEE that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was an “Arab” “Muslim”, according to that document.

[Yosemitest]

REFERENCE:

The Real Alinsky Rules Of Obama

(Excerpt)



At its core, Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is demonic, but don’t take my word for it. Alinsky himself, among many dedications at the beginning of his work, wrote:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

In his Prologue he wrote:

“The Revolutionary force today has two targets, moral as well as material. Its young protagonists are one moment reminiscent of the idealistic early Christians, yet they also urge violence and cry, ‘Burn the system down!’ They have no illusions about the system, but plenty of illusions about the way to change our world. It is to this point that I have written this book.”

He then went on to write, “Few of us survived the Joe McCarthy holocaust of the early 1950s and of those there were even fewer whose understanding and insights had developed beyond the dialectical materialism of orthodox Marxism. My fellow radicals who were supposed to pass on the torch of experience and insights to a new generation just were not there.”

To demonstrate the demonic flavor of Alinsky, he quotes Job 7:1, “The life of man upon earth is a warfare,” while at the same time teaching a doctrine of devils.

He then states his purpose in writing the book.

“WHAT FOLLOWS IS for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.” pg. 3

“In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace…. ‘Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.’ This means revolution.” p.3

“Radicals must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing.” p.6

“A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage — the political paradise of communism.” p.10

“An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth — truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing…. To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations….” pp.10-11

Alinsky’s tactics were based, not on Stalin’s revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci’s transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.

Like Alinsky, Mikhail Gorbachev followed Gramsci, not Lenin. In fact, Gramsci aroused Stalins’s wrath by suggesting that Lenin’s revolutionary plan wouldn’t work in the West. Instead the primary assault would be on Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be crushed as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:

“By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible…. Gramsci’s master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity’s transcendent God.”