1 posted on
08/05/2013 12:23:48 PM PDT by
xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: xzins
Wow. So now the RNC is going to punish networks by not allowing them to air debates they didn't want to air. Nice going RNC. You guys are such sages...
Ramirez's latest political cartoon LARGE VERSION 08/04/2013: LINK LINK to regular sized version of Ramirez's latest, and an archive of his political cartoons.
FOLKS, THOSE OF YOU WHO CAN, PLEASE CLICK HERE AND PENCIL IN YOUR DONATION TO HELP END THIS FREEPATHON. THANK YOU!
...this is a general all purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...
40 posted on
08/05/2013 1:33:02 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Kill the bill... Begin enforcing our current laws, signed by President Ronald Reagan.)
To: xzins
Good move, Rinse!! Let’s go ahead and shoot ourselves in the foot, then cut off the leg to stop the bleeding!!
God, give me strength, this man is so stupid he’s giving stupid people a bad name!! Apparently, the RNC has no issue with ‘Pubbies appearing on TV shows with such hostile “interviewers” as Matt Wower, George Stephanopanopanopoulos, the shrill witches of “the View”, Katy “I’m Still Cuter Than You Are” Couric and a whole host of others.
But, in the face of a prejudicial “miniseries” promoting HiLLIARy!, they want to throw a temper tantrum. IMO, HiLLIARy! doesn’t have a real chance to take the leftist nomination. After 8 years of zero’s inept, incompetent, narcissistic, communist (and exceptionally dubious) “leadership”, I don’t really believe that America will fall all over itself to vote for another incompetent, inept communist whose philandering husband would LOVE to get back to chasing interns in the WH.
Not happenin’ - no how, no way!
44 posted on
08/05/2013 1:49:47 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for the American politburo!!)
To: xzins
If they had any balls they would let someone like Mark Levin or Rush host the damn things.
Fair is fair, right?
46 posted on
08/05/2013 1:56:48 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: xzins
Apparently, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus has the backing of those in Iowa and South Carolina.
The Stupid Party would be wise to forego NBC altogether, regardless.
47 posted on
08/05/2013 3:06:36 PM PDT by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: xzins
The Republicans should have refused decades ago to attend rigged Lamestream Media debates!
To: xzins
What RNC? By then there won’t BE an RNC; shoot, there’s only one party now—Washington, D.C. elitists bent on keep their cushy jobs.
To: xzins
I pondered this a good while. At first I thought it was a good thing, then I thought it was ineffectual. Then it occurred to me that this might be the first effort at drawing public attention to both the bias of the networks and the ridiculous and probably highly boring Hillary shows.
So, I don't know. Maybe the RNC is dog whistlin' to the party that we're not going to put up with Candy Crowleys anymore.
54 posted on
08/05/2013 6:57:30 PM PDT by
Mamzelle
To: xzins
Can’t we get rid of this wet noodle and get someone with half an IQ at the RNC?????.......
To: xzins
57 posted on
08/06/2013 10:04:31 PM PDT by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: xzins; Jim Robinson
.
.
- I remind those on Free Republic that forgot:
Years ago on a FR Sidebar Poll about choices for President -
- Over 16% selected Hillary Rodham Clinton.....
Do you actually think you know who you are posting to on Free Republic?
.
.
58 posted on
08/07/2013 8:59:57 PM PDT by
devolve
(----- ----- ----- it not unlegal iffen I do*s it ----- ----- -----)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson