Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCjim
The article offers and interesting perspective. Not on Benghazi, but Obama. That's nice. But the question on the table for me is still:

Who actually attacked actually organized the Benghazi attack? This was not a spontaneous demonstration. The attackers were, I believe, mostly locals but with a foreign sponsor.

Who was that sponsor?

We have never been told. That is the big secret of Benghazi.

5 posted on 08/05/2013 5:01:09 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

Sorry, this is a disappointing article given the headline.


6 posted on 08/05/2013 5:03:01 AM PDT by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

We may not know the sponsors yet, but Morsi appears to have been involved in sending some of the attackers from Egypt. And since we know that, it blows my mind that Obama would continue to stick up for Morsi and the MB...unless he doesn’t want Morsi to spill some beans.


18 posted on 08/05/2013 8:28:07 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be what you might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint
Who actually attacked actually organized the Benghazi attack? This was not a spontaneous demonstration. The attackers were, I believe, mostly locals but with a foreign sponsor. . .

_________________________________________________________

WRONG!

The people there who survived said the attackers were not locals, they had accents that were not from Lybia at all. They were Egyptian according to their accents.

Mr. Obama put Morsi in place, Morsi put the Bengazi attackers in place.

The story is that there was to be a kidnapping of the ambassador. In return for his release we would release the blind Sheik to Egypt where he is VERY popular with the radicals. Radicals make up over 20% of Egypt so that makes him very popular indeed.

To make this work the US had to reduce the security at the Benghazi consulate. This we did. The most dangerous consulate in the whole world was Benghazi and it had the least security. Weeks before the attack the CIA protectors were moved off campus and ALL the security responsibility was given to paid local Al Qeuda types. When the time came they of course walked away or perhaps even led the attackers to the ambassador.

In order to keep all this secret only a few people knew about it. The CIA operatives on the ground that had been moved off campus did not know about it. They heard of the shooting and responded to the radio and phone calls for help from the ambassador who was also out of the loop. Several of America's finest risked their own lives to protect and save the Ambassador, to no avail.

What has happened in Benghazi is the worst case of Treason ever perpetrated upon this country. Murder for political gain. It wasn't supposed to be murder it was supposed to be political intrigue and sucessful diplomacy but these kind of lies seldom work as planned. The truth will likely be told by someone who knows eventually. There is simply no reason on earth for the reduction in security at the Benghazi consulate.

This is a plan hatched by the president and the wannabe next president who was Sec. State.

Shame.

32 posted on 08/05/2013 12:00:41 PM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson