Marco Rubio, John McCain, Lindsey Graham,, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, etc. also say that the system is broken. What they propose will not make it better, but rather, exacerbate the situation. When you adopt the lexicon of the left, you can expect misunderstandings as to where you stand.
I am not for amnesty
How do you define the word amnesty? Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio say their plan is not amnesty. Do you support Cantor's proposed bill on Dreamers?
I recognized that he was getting job satisfaction by harassing middle-class Caucasians, because the situation at California's border was uncontrollable -no job satisfaction at all.
Judge Dismisses ICE Agents' Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Deferred Action
"In his decision to dismiss the case, O’Connor, sitting in Dallas, Texas, nonetheless reiterated his view that DACA was inherently unlawful."
“Plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Department of Homeland Security has implemented a program contrary to congressional mandate,” he said in his ruling."
The problem is that the political leadership of the Executive Branch will not let the agents enforce the laws despite the fact that the President has sworn to faithfully execute the laws of the United States of America.
The resolution implied that ICE management had "abandoned the agency's core mission of enforcing U.S. immigration laws and providing for public safety," the voting body thought they (ICE leadership) were more likely "to campaign for programs and policies related to amnesty and the creation of a special detention system for foreign nationals that exceeds the care and services provided to most U.S. citizens similarly incarcerated.”
That is what I mean by broken. Wheel-spinning, ineffectiveness, and bullying of the vulnerable.
Bullying of the vulnerable? BS. Who are the vulnerable?
Broken means not in working order. Whatever laws have been in force for the past thirty years, have not been enforced properly, thus Not Working:Broken. Just like anything else that is broken, there are two choices: fix it or replace it. (Doing without, is not an option in this case. Our country has an obligation to control immigration.)
My comments to you have nothing to do in reference to the names of politicians that you cite. I have endorsed none of the proposed new laws. Every year I have wanted Congress to insist that our borders, and our visa over-stayers be monitored . Why do they not do that!
Vulnerable: people with something to lose, who will buckle to bureaucratic pressure.
For example: police set up radar traps on a Saturday morning on a stretch of road so safe that they can walk out in front of their car to wave down the “speeding” motorist. But they seem incapable of stopping real crime or crazy drivers.
Or
INS incapable of stopping organized fraud as they send ‘refund’ checks to fake bank accounts to the tune of billions of dollars, while they have dozens of lawyers harassing citizens applying for a tax-exempt status if their organization seems to be anti-statist.