Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libstripper

And John Henry could wait ten years and assume another 93% loss on his money. Don’t these people realize that there is no money in this type of news anymore?


4 posted on 08/03/2013 10:16:16 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kempster

The loss is actually over 100%. They paid $1.1 billion for the Globe and received $70 million on the sale, but also assumed the Globe’s $110 million pension liability. If you subtract that $110 million form the $70 million they received it’s a $40 million on the sale alone that then needs to be added to the total $1.1 billion write off of the original purchase price. Hence, the total loss is $1,140,000,000.


14 posted on 08/03/2013 10:24:36 AM PDT by libstripper (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kempster

That sounds like the topic of a good folk song.


18 posted on 08/03/2013 10:30:52 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kempster

What are their land holdings and equipment worth in scrap?


26 posted on 08/03/2013 10:52:10 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kempster

“And John Henry could wait ten years and assume another 93% loss on his money. Don’t these people realize that there is no money in this type of news anymore?”

Apparently not. I initially figured Henry must have been another one of those billionaires who were so old that they had to turn the charging crank on the telephone before making a call when they were growing up, but I checked, and Henry is only 64. Like Vincent said in “Pulp Fiction”, he should fuching better know better.

It’s even a losing proposition for our side. Our billionaires would be much better to buy a struggling cable/satellite channel and convert it to a hard core conservative news and entertainment venue. At least, if I was a conservative billionaire and was looking for an entertaining hobby, that’s what I would do.


30 posted on 08/03/2013 11:13:24 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kempster
Don’t these people realize that there is no money in this type of news anymore?

A worthy question, kempster, to which I don't claim to have the answer. All I've got is a hunch: properly managed, a big city newspaper ought to be able to break even and turn a modest profit. The new owner ought to diversify the Globe into direct advertising media and internet sites, as well as transform the "news" paper back into a legitimate newspaper. I doubt the market for news has evaporated; whether newspapers can boot-strap themselves out of the past, however, remains to be seen.

35 posted on 08/03/2013 11:41:46 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kempster

I think a conservative newspaper with strong tight local circulation and coverage would work.


46 posted on 08/03/2013 1:29:54 PM PDT by GOPJ (Sob stories make bad law...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson