I realize that.
The point I am trying to make is that he can do it with much less effort that either Hitler or Stalin because of today’s technology.
And the utter compliance and complacency of those who could put a stop to it.
There was a time in the dim past when neither Hitler nor Stalin had killed anybody. They had to start somewhere. Wouldn’t it have been wonderful if someone had seen their potential before allowing it to happen as it did.
I see that point and agree, but still don’t see the comparison to the reign of a Hitler or Stalin (which was the original discussion). If Obama ends up murdering 25+ million. It’s not helpful to the debate and makes people roll their eyes and dismiss the person who said it.