Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Okay. Let me get this straight. The Keystone Pipeline is not a “jobs plan” but ObamaCare is. Doh! Pelosi and Reid keep telling us about all the jobs ObamaCare is going to “create”. Lots of shovel-ready undertaker jobs will be created.


12 posted on 07/30/2013 8:02:56 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Let's make it our turn in 2014. Vote early and VOTE OFTEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FlingWingFlyer
From Forbes Magazine:

The Keystone XL Pipeline project is owned by TransCanada, a Canadian corporation which builds, maintains, and owns oil and gas pipelines, power plants, and natural gas storage facilities in North America.  TransCanada already owns the Keystone Pipeline which runs in two branches from Alberta to both Nebraska and Illinois.  The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would follow a direct route from Alberta through Montana and South Dakota to Nebraska and then continue through Kansas and Oklahoma to the refineries in Texas along the Gulf Coast.  This new pipeline would ideally transport crude petroleum recovered from the Alberta tar sands and from North Dakota shale fields.  This petroleum contains more sulfur and requires additional refining which can be completed in Houston refineries.

The chart below compares some of the key facts of these two pipeline projects.

Trans-Alaska Pipeline (actual)

Keystone XL Pipeline

(proposal)

Length

800 miles

1,179 miles

Maximum capacity in barrels per day

2.1 million BPD

830,000 BDP

Pipe diameter

48 inch

36 inch

Estimated cost before construction

$900 million

$5.3 billion

Actual cost

$8 billion

Construction time

3 years 2 months

2 years

Starting point

Prudhoe Bay, Alaska

Hardisty, Alberta

Termination

Valdez, Alaska

Houston, Texas

Employment Estimates

Estimates for job creation statistics for the Trans-Alaska Pipeline’s construction continued to fluctuate from the time it was first planned until the labor was set.  In March of 1973, Alyeska estimated that the pipeline would employ 26,000 people in construction jobs.  These numbers were later dropped significantly to 18,000 construction jobs in October 1973.  By January of 1974, once union contracts for the labor had been negotiated, Alyeska estimated that “perhaps 13,000” jobs would be created, “at its peak.”  During the summer of 1974, when initial work on the pipeline was just getting started, the labor force was estimated to grow to more than 14,000 workers by the following spring, when the pipe-laying would begin.  When the company began hiring in earnest in March 1975, they estimated that between 14,000 and 18,000 workers would be required that summer.  The chart below shows the fluctuations in job predictions for construction workers preceding hiring.

 

In reality, Alyeska employed 21,000 workers during peak construction in the summers of 1975 and 1976.  Despite the fact that Alyeska kept dropping its estimated job numbers, the company employed more workers then all their prediction except for the first.  By numbers hired, the project was a huge success.  But, how do these estimates compare to the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, and what does this teach us?

The table below illustrates the fluctuations in construction worker job predictions for three different sources: Trans-Canada, the U.S. federal government, and a study conducted by a the Global Labor Institute at Cornell University’s College of Industrial and Labor Relations.  Trans-Canada’s job predictions follow a generally similar path to Alyeska’s, in which the job estimates tend to decrease as the project approaches its start date.


15 posted on 07/30/2013 8:08:23 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Let’s use our common sense shall we?

This megaproject will stretch 1,661 miles from Alberta to Texas’s Gulf Coast region. Immediately upon completion, the pipeline will have the capacity to carry 700,000 barrels per day (bpd) and ultimately the ability to transport 900,000 bpd.

The ability to move an additional 900,000 bpd to refineries won’t have the effect of lowering gas prices?

In fact, the Keystone XL pipeline will give our country a more stable and cheaper source of fuel and create thousands of quality American jobs. And taxpayers (think Solyndra) will not risk a dime.

Think of the public-policy benefits of the project, the sound private economics aside.

The United States currently consumes 25% of the world’s energy, but produces less than 5 percent. Heavily dependent on foreign oil, America imports 11 million barrels each day.

This need for foreign oil isn’t going to change anytime soon. The 2010 Annual Energy Outlook projects that over 40 percent of U.S. liquid fuel consumption will be supplied by imports through 2035. Global demand for oil will only rise too — 39% between 2005 and 2030.

Also note that oil imports to the United States from South America aren’t holding steady. Mexico and Venezuela, two historically large exporters of crude oil, have radically reduced production in the past few years, making imports from Canada that much more essential.

A new influx of up to 700,000 bpd from Canada will dramatically increase U.S supplies and in turn drive gas prices down. A study from Energy Policy Research Foundation found a greater supply of Canadian oil could save Gulf Coast refiners almost $500 million annually in transport costs, which, in turn, would mean lower prices for consumers at the pump.

Keystone XL’s impact on cost is simple: a supply of plentiful and easily accessible oil drives down prices for gasoline and other consumer staples.


20 posted on 07/30/2013 8:15:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson