[meadsjn]

Extant Supreme Court rulings suggest that such surveillance does not qualify as a “search” for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, Kelly added, and so does not require a warrant.

OK. By this reasoning, some group of private citizens should be able to put up a fleet of drones to monitor our treasonous politicians and bureaucrats 24/7/365, and we should expect no complaints.

[Boogieman]

Won’t work, they’ll just get the FAA to declare it “restricted airspace”, or require civilians to get “drone licenses” and file their flightpaths with the FAA for approval.

Drones for me, but not for thee!