What then?
Posted on 07/29/2013 12:32:52 PM PDT by Lorianne
There are lots of predictions the Affordable Care Act will force employers to lay off employees, reduce hours, and cut seasonal positions. But a report released Monday from the National Bureau of Economic Research finds that up to nearly 1 million workers may voluntarily leave their jobs because of the new health care law.
For empirical evidence of this, the authors point to something dramatic that happened in Tennessee back in 2005. Finances forced state officials to kick 170,000 people off the Medicaid program, which primarily serves low-income residents.
“That’s the largest disenrollment in the history of Medicaid. So this was a pretty big change,” says Tal Gross, a health economist at Columbia and co-author.
What happened next, says Gross, is critical to understanding the potential impact of the Affordable Care Act.
“Roughly half of the people who lost public coverage, regained private coverage through an employer,” he says.
That’s right, people went back to work just so they could have health insurance. Gross believes we’ll likely see the exact opposite under the Affordable Care Act with about 900,000 people leaving their jobs. That’ll happen because for some, the option of subsidized insurance is better than work.
Economist Joe Antos with the American Enterprise Institute says this is a kind of test for the Affordable Care Act.
“If we see over time, that people do in fact migrate from employers, then that’s a pretty good indicator that things worked out well,” he says.
Antos says leaving a job behind is a sign there are affordable insurance options out there. But he says it also means so-called able-bodied adults will get taxpayer subsidized health coverage, when they could be at work.
“The question I think we have is what is the cost to taxpayers, what is the cost to society,” he says.
This report though, gets at something bigger. The Affordable Care Act weakens the bond between your job and your health insurance. MIT economist Amy Finkelstein says it’s hard to make good choices with those two linked.
“It’s like, let’s take a crazy example, suppose we said you know the only way you get food is you have to work 20 hours a week as a Marketplace reporter," Finklestein says. "You’d be better off if you could choose them separately. Some people like to be Marketplace reporters and some people don’t. Most people, though, do want food,” she says.
This report makes it clear the new law gives people choices they didn’t have before.
And like Pelosi might say, “That’s 1 million more people writing poetry, painting pictures and learning how to play the guitar.” I love this country!!!
Oops. Ya mean employees won’t voluntarily pay for health insurance by working because they’d get it for free it they don’t? We never thought of that. Oh, and employers have $100,000 of dollars laying around to put 30 hour per week employees on benefits just because we made a new law? Scratching head, what went wrong? But we made it law! I mean, dude!
Many people are already being freed from working more than 29 hours per week. Isn’t that wonderful?
My wife knows some women who are working in near-minimum wage jobs just to pay their health premium. In view of that, this article makes perfect sense.
I’m going to fulfill my dream of becoming a Lippiziner Stallion.
To a Democrat: Millions unemployed = Not HAVING to work.
I would LOVE to work 3 10-hour days each week
I would shovel ditches for a 4 day weekend every single week
I always wanted to learn to play the chello, I mean jello...one of those big fiddles.
I know people who have MS (I have MS, so I have acquaintances in the MS community) who are working their jobs to keep insurance. Because even though they'd qualify for disability, you don't get insurance along with the disability...I believe you have to wait 2 years for Medicare to kick in. And to file for disability you have to be unemployed. So they work, and for some they're perfectly able, but for others, it's a struggle.
I work because I like to work, but I work from home. If my job involved going to my office and working in the office environment, working would not be an option. I'd still be covered by insurance because we use my husband's group insurance.
All that to say some people continue working with medical conditions just because without the job they would not be able to purchase insurance due to a pre-existing condition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.