Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

The “why” is obvious: to “out” the permit holders and try to make them social pariahs, in pursuance of the “progressive” jihad against gun owners.


3 posted on 07/28/2013 5:31:21 AM PDT by hitkicker (The only thing worse than a politician is a child molester)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hitkicker

And we thought 1945 was the end of the Nazi era. The pigs at AP are part of the new Gestapo.


11 posted on 07/28/2013 6:00:04 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker

Our sheriff has stated publicly and on the record he will destroy the database of cc permits before he would let it be turned over to anyone outside his office.


18 posted on 07/28/2013 8:29:29 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker

in liberal states maybe, but in MT? That is not likely to happen.


27 posted on 07/28/2013 3:14:07 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian. I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker

Agreed. This is why I do not have a permit!


30 posted on 07/28/2013 3:28:45 PM PDT by noprogs (Borders, Language, Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker
The “why” is obvious: to “out” the permit holders and try to make them social pariahs, in pursuance of the “progressive” jihad against gun owners.

It goes far beyond "outing" permit holders to make them social pariahs. Providing current addresses on people who have fled an abusive spouse, who have individuals who have made credible and ongoing threats to their well-being, or who have moved to escape stalkers and other freaks, places those individuals and their families at risk.

The crusade to 'socially embarrass' people could lead to their death or the death of their loved ones (or a situation similar to a recently overly reported perpetrator elimination).

At the very least, they would be in possession of a list of firearm owners, which, if published, would provide ready-made burglary targets for those inclined to stake out the residences for an opportunity to steal firearms.

One thing is certain, no good will come of such information in the hands of those who make their living revealing information amidst hype.

36 posted on 07/28/2013 8:52:29 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker

That’ll really play well in Montana. Yup. Montanans just hate gun owners./s


37 posted on 07/28/2013 9:29:25 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker

Publish the age and address and help the criminals select the oldest, supposedly weakest victims. (Of course there can be surprising exceptions!)


42 posted on 07/29/2013 6:29:20 AM PDT by HomeAtLast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: hitkicker

Yeah, but in Montana. A state that is kind of in support of the 2nd Amendment.

I know that a few cities have been invaded by Californians, but I’m thinking that there isn’t too much shame in having a CCW or owning guns in that state.


46 posted on 07/29/2013 7:01:30 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson