A lot of these SYG-type repeal and amendment BS legislation making the rounds this week.
Even if the "Trayvon Martin Amendment" or something like that had been in effect at the time in FL...Trayvon Marton would still be a dead thug, and George Zimmerman would still be a free (innocent) man.
Merika Coleman-Evans
1 posted on
07/24/2013 7:13:06 AM PDT by
kevcol
To: kevcol
Or Zimmerman, the victim, would be dead or severely injured. Of course, this would have never made it in the news.
2 posted on
07/24/2013 7:15:55 AM PDT by
dhs12345
To: kevcol
Why doesn’t she call it the “Defend Our Thugs” Amendment. Why use only Martin’s name?
3 posted on
07/24/2013 7:16:45 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Amnesty. The DemocRATS' payback for the 2010 elections.)
To: kevcol
It’s a waste of time. Alabama will NEVER pass an amendment like this.
4 posted on
07/24/2013 7:18:10 AM PDT by
BO Stinkss
(RINOs suck)
To: kevcol
Rep. Merika Coleman-Evans, D-Pleasant Grove I'm guessing this amendment is racially motivated.
5 posted on
07/24/2013 7:19:11 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: kevcol
This is really getting tiresome. Here's a more accurate sentance:
The legislation is directly inspired by the shooting of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin, the self-styled @No-Limit_Nigga, in Florida while he was trying to beat to death a man he called a "creepy ass cracka".
10 posted on
07/24/2013 7:55:02 AM PDT by
tbpiper
To: kevcol
George Zimmerman did NOT use ‘Stand Your Ground’ as a defense.
It was simply self defense from a thug that attacked.
The Left will never let any invented crisis go to waste.
11 posted on
07/24/2013 7:55:50 AM PDT by
RedMDer
(When immigrants cannot or will not assimilate, its really just an invasion. Throw them out!)
To: kevcol
The legislation is directly inspired by the shooting of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin in Florida. Inspired? Considering that SYG had absolutely nothing to do with Traydmark getting his punk ass killed, how is this inspired?
12 posted on
07/24/2013 8:06:20 AM PDT by
upchuck
(To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
To: kevcol
Lawmakers seek change or repeal of Alabama's Stand Your Ground lawREQUEST DENIED
13 posted on
07/24/2013 8:11:16 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: kevcol
Actually, do not many SYG laws make such a provision for the "first in" not being entitled to a SYG defense? In other words, you cannot provoke a confrontation, make your victim fight back, and then claim stand your ground as you shoot the victim.
NOTE WELL, the prosecution in the Zimmerman trial DID NOT raise this objection, possible under Florida law. I took that as implicit recognition of what the testimony and evidence proved: Zimmerman disengaged and it was St. Skittles that was the aggressor in a separate, but related incident, his subsequent ambush attack of Zimmerman.
I had made that point when the initial reporting of the Sanford shooting went down, that if it was continuous action as the early reports implied, Zimmerman was cooked as the aggressor. But he wasn't.
14 posted on
07/24/2013 8:23:33 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
To: kevcol
Alabama House - 67 R 38 D
Alabama Senate - 22 R 11D 1I
Can you say DOA!
15 posted on
07/24/2013 8:24:57 AM PDT by
commish
(The takers rule. Time to implement the triple G plan - GOD, GUNS, & GOLD)
To: kevcol
Call this what it is, a "Thug Protection" effort. The implication of repealing SYG is that if a thug threatens you, you have to run away. So a bully or group of them can go around menacing people with impunity. Turn the streets back to the criminals.
"Defeat the Thug Protection Act".
To: kevcol
negro rabble rouser lawmakers seek.....
To make themselves appear relevant
Jefferson county is also bankrupt like Deetroit
19 posted on
07/24/2013 8:29:45 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
To: kevcol
20 posted on
07/24/2013 8:33:28 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: kevcol
What these race pimps are most concerned about is the fact that SYG laws provide immunity from any civil lawsuits filed by the assailant or his surviving family. That is also why their democrat masters are trying to force gun owners to carry high levels of liability insurance. Whitey's gotta pay if he successfully defends himself against a beatdown.
An excerpt from: Alabama Code - Section 13A-3-23: USE OF FORCE IN DEFENSE OF A PERSON:
(4)(d) A person who uses force, including deadly physical force, as justified and permitted in this section is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the force was determined to be unlawful.
21 posted on
07/24/2013 10:42:22 AM PDT by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson