AbstractViral infections are common causes of fever without an apparent source in young children. Despite absence of bacterial infection, many febrile children are treated with antibiotics. Virus and bacteria interact with different pattern recognition receptors in circulating blood leukocytes, triggering specific host transcriptional programs mediating immune response. Therefore, unique transcriptional signatures may be defined that discriminate viral from bacterial causes of fever without an apparent source. Gene expression microarray analyses were conducted on blood samples from 30 febrile children positive for adenovirus, human herpesvirus 6, or enterovirus infection or with acute bacterial infection and 22 afebrile controls. Blood leukocyte transcriptional profiles clearly distinguished virus-positive febrile children from both virus-negative afebrile controls and afebrile children with the same viruses present in the febrile children. Virus-specific gene expression profiles could be defined. The IFN signaling pathway was uniquely activated in febrile children with viral infection, whereas the integrin signaling pathway was uniquely activated in children with bacterial infection. Transcriptional profiles classified febrile children with viral or bacterial infection with better accuracy than white blood cell count in the blood. Similarly accurate classification was shown with data from an independent study using different microarray platforms. Our results support the paradigm of using host response to define the etiology of childhood infections. This approach could be an important supplement to highly sensitive tests that detect the presence of a possible pathogen but do not address its pathogenic role in the patient being evaluated.
How 3D Printing Can Build New Bone
Stricter standards sought to curb stem-cell confusion
Not Everything Is Due To Bias, Including All-Male Physics Departments
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
If the assay time could drop below an hour, this would be great. We have endemic Lacross viral meningitis cropping up this summer. Patients would love to get rid of the dreaded tap. Realistically, turn around time is a major, major factor.
I’m curious to know, what if the patient is sick from simultaneous bacteriological and viral infections? Does the test reveal elevated activity for both, or does simply give inconclusive results? With the right selection of specific genes could signatures of specific pathogens appear?