Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No surprise the comments call it a sham study, etc., etc. It's preliminary but important none-the-less.
1 posted on 07/19/2013 10:28:12 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

It won’t penetrate the rind of the watermelons. Nothing does once they decide something.


2 posted on 07/19/2013 11:07:14 PM PDT by volunbeer (We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

Good post. Thanks.


3 posted on 07/19/2013 11:13:33 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

Interesting fracking study.


4 posted on 07/19/2013 11:54:31 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

Anybody thats in the business knows just how rediculous these claims of fracing contaminating underground water sources really is. The claims of methane contamination are just as rediculous, methanes been seeping up from the ground long before drilling or even people were around.


5 posted on 07/20/2013 2:53:22 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

The left is impervious to the truth; facts are meaningless.


7 posted on 07/20/2013 8:54:23 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

I hear crickets churping. When will New York drop their ban?


8 posted on 07/26/2013 12:27:13 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson