[sickoflibs]

RE :”says most House Republicans would support a comprehensive bill that is considerably more robust in its “trigger” structure and enforcement provisions.
....
There you go, he thinks Tea Party people are toothless hillbillies who will swallow anything with the word “enforcement” in it. “

The argument that passing any amnesty just because its linked to enforcement is suicidal because Obama will just refuse to enforce any part he wants is a very strong political argument, now that Obama delayed enforcement of O-care. I feel very comfortable with this.

This Obama decision is very convenient for us in this national debate.

Now how about ‘the kids’ ?? (newest argument by Bohner)

Every path the GOP can take on 'the kids' is dangerous for us.
Citizenship, no citizenship, and even opposing them are all losers for GOP and winners for libs.

My least dangerous(if I was in charge) idea which no-one would go for , I mean no one(so I am safe), would be to simply make Obamas exec order into a law with some new regulations added. Its Temporary renewed every 5 years and they have to out themselves to get it. And the GOP could use for once : 'Obama is opposing his OWN idea' as payback as they been doing to us over and over.

But in real terms I agree that we must stop anything from reaching Obama;s desk. If Obama sign anything on this it must be bad.,

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Thanks. Looks like they are really getting brazen.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” Every path the GOP can take on ‘the kids’ is dangerous for us.
Citizenship, no citizenship, and even opposing them are all losers for GOP and winners for libs.”

Correct