Is it only me, or does anyone else NOT remember the Washington Post, Washington Times, LA Times, NY Times, Newsweek, Time, Boston Globe, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN or any other typical media outlet putting out all of these articles about a miscarriage of justice when OJ Simpson was acquitted of the murder of Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ron Goldman?
Simpson was guilty 100% beyond any reasonable shadow of doubt. A blood trail went from the murder scene, stopped where a car would have been entered, and resumed where a car was parked into a residence, with blood all over the inside of the vehicle leading from the car to the door of the residence.
And it was discounted because the defense put Mark Fuhrman on trial instead of the prosecution putting OJ on trial. Their idea of “reasonable doubt” was to create a racist cop who had a hangup about black men and white women who planted a glove and blood evidence.
If the prosecution in the Zimmerman case could have gotten away with figuring out how to impanel a bunch of dumb-ass racist jurors (as the defense did in the Simpson trial) they would have convinced them that Zimmerman shot Martin in the back as he fled in terror for his life, then broke his own nose and split the back of his own head on the ground.
You can count on it. Well, they just didn’t have Johnny Cochrane running their case, may that son of a bitch rot in Hell, which I am certain he is.
I could be dead wrong, but I'm fairly confident that the Washington Times was not part of that group. They've always been very conservative. Wesley Pruden, who wrote the article that we're commenting on, was the editor of the Times.