If firearms are required to be displayed at all times, and a criminal sees no one has a firearm, the incentive is there to commit a criminal act upon such persons.
I realize that but I’m just saying that deterrence sometimes lauds off attacks. I’d rather display a weapon and be bypassed but your point is good.
I know but I know a person who owns a business in a high crime area who has never been robbed because all his employees weapons are plainly visible. I understand your point though.