Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bestintxas

Think like a democrat.

They don’t intend to win a civil rights case, that might appease the plantation dwellers. Then what do they have?

No, they intend to talk about a civil rights case and maybe even bring one that they will lose or drop while blaming racism/republicans. That will reignite the fire and keep the slaves on the plantation.


2 posted on 07/15/2013 7:27:18 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
No, they intend to talk about a civil rights case and maybe even bring one that they will lose or drop while blaming racism/republicans. That will reignite the fire and keep the slaves on the plantation.

Bingo. AKA "It's the seriousness of the charge" to keep the Agitprop alive.

4 posted on 07/15/2013 7:31:35 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek
No, they intend to talk about a civil rights case and maybe even bring one that they will lose or drop while blaming racism/republicans. That will reignite the fire and keep the slaves on the plantation.

If I were high in the Democratic [sic] party, I believe I'd have to wonder how much actual labor the slaves on the party plantation were producing. How much does that party pay versus how much does it actually get?

"All those loyal voters and their votes, of course!" you may well reply.

Oh, yeah? Why would the Democratic [sic] party bother with voters or votes when fake vote tallies are far less expensive, far less bothersome, far more reliable, far less time-consuming, and probably even far more fun? Massive, systematic election fraud will probably always require a certain modest amount of vote fraud, but that's the wave of the past.

Why waste money feeding unnecessary slaves?

8 posted on 07/15/2013 7:47:00 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Gee ,while they are at it, why don’t they charge Zimmerman with child abuse? After all, Trayvon was 17 years old, and legally a minor. What ever happened to those charges? Maybe those can come back?


12 posted on 07/15/2013 8:09:01 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson