[jazusamo]

It's time for Democratic leaders to encourage Holder's departure. If they lack the will to do so, the House Judiciary should initiate impeachment of Holder.

Well said by Clarice Feldman.

[GraceG]

Let’s pick on of Holder’s biggest victims as his replacement....

That is the only way to get “Social Justice”

I am looking forward to Attorney General Joe Arpaio.....

[tomkat]

             

[gusopol3]

She’s kidding if she thinks it’s just that they “don’t have the will” to remove him. Harry Reid’s comments and the whole slew of them baying on the talk shows today show that they fully support and encourage whatever the race baiters can get away with.

[mylife]

Holder should have been removed from office the day he said “I will not prosecute my people”

[cripplecreek]

One problem is that the attorney general now acts as the president’s personal prosecutor or defender as needed. The AG should not represent the presidency.

One of the nice things about having an elected AG in Michigan is the fact that they represent the people, not the governor.

[jazusamo]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

[OldNavyVet]

Writing for the court in Clinton v. City of New York, Justice John Paul Stevens noted: "There is no provision in the Constitution that authorizes the president to enact, to amend, or to repeal statutes."

Adding to that thought, I think Justice Roberts was right in upholding the Obamacare law because, irregardless of it's defects, Obamacare IS A LAW that was legitimately passed by Congress and SIGNED by the President.

Obama and his ilk made the law, so now ... we all have to live (throwing up) with it; until it's legitimately repealed.

[Mister Da]

The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, which advises the president on legal and constitutional issues, has repeatedly opined that the president may decline to enforce laws he believes are unconstitutional. If this is legal, then the President is free to ignore ALL laws if he "believes" (pure opinion) the law may be struck down by the USSC, if that may ever happen, now or 100 years from now. Nonsense. The President MUST enforce the laws that are in effect during his presidency without regard to their legitimacy in his mind.

[Jabba the Nutt]

Is there a lawyer in the House?

Can George Zimmerman sue Angela Corey, Bernie de la Rionda and the other prosecutors?

Can the Florida House impeach the scheme team for their actions? If not why not? Will they? They didn't impeach the SCOFLAWS after the 2000 election.

As long as the elected representatives do not crack down on criminal government, we will have more criminal government? Who will stand up for our rights?