Only if those who said an all woman jury would never deliver a “ Not Guilty” verdict eat the crow first!
Only if those who said an all woman jury would never deliver a “ Not Guilty” verdict eat the crow first!...
...sorry...not going to be frying any birds for dinner...this case was so open and shut it was quite an easy decision for them...I’ll withhold judgment on entirely females juries until some more difficult case crops up...
“Only if those who said an all woman jury would never deliver a ‘Not Guilty’ verdict eat the crow first!”
I did say I did not think THIS all-woman jury would acquit him, and that I thought they’d return with a manslaughter conviction. I am happy to be proved wrong, and I apologize to this jury for thinking they’d succumb to political pressure.
That being said, women DO tend to apply more emotion to their jury deliberations than men. Especially in civil trials where someone has been injured or damaged and is suing for money to “be made whole” again. I see that on a daily basis. But this was a criminal trial, and awarding money was not the object, but rather a man’s freedom was. I applaud this jury.
“Only if those who said an all woman jury would never deliver a “ Not Guilty” verdict eat the crow first!”
Every adult female relative, we have from my wife down to nieces would have voted not guilty.
The same goes for the female friends we have. They saw this as a racist travesty pushed by Sharpton, the Outhouse, Holder and his black racists in the AG office and the M$M mediots.
We're not hearing much from all the men (and women) who made negative comments about emotional and intellectually inferior women and their inability to make a rational decision.
How about some apologies from you folks?