Skip to comments.
Obama spending $650 million on shorelines
WND ^
| July 13, 2013
| Steve Peacock
Posted on 07/13/2013 6:13:10 PM PDT by Steve Peacock
Prepping for 'climate change' floods everywhere but in U.S.
The Obama administration wants to spend as much $650 million to improve urban- and local-government service delivery, which includes the development of strategies to adapt to climate change and respond to natural disasters.
The endeavor will target cities and towns around the globe with the exception of those in the United States.
Many coastal cities around the world are ill-prepared to deal with rising sea levels and extreme weather events that the administration expects from climate change.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: Connecticut; US: New Jersey; US: New York
KEYWORDS: agw; agwfraud; bho44; bhofascism; climatechange; criminalpresident; democrats; envirofascism; federalspending; foreignaid; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenfraud; obama; thegreenlie
To: Steve Peacock
Obama is intentionally trying to bankrupt the nation.
He just looks for ways to spend money on projects that have no intrinsic value and won’t do anything lasting to improve the job market or the out of control spending.
2
posted on
07/13/2013 6:18:08 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.)
To: Steve Peacock
So, he’s going to build a wall around all the coastal areas, I wonder? Or put all the building on stilts?
3
posted on
07/13/2013 6:22:00 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
To: Steve Peacock
Redistribution, aka stealing, of our nations wealth to supporters of fascism worldwide.
4
posted on
07/13/2013 6:30:51 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(If conservatives in America were committed to liberty they would Cairo DC!)
To: Steve Peacock
5
posted on
07/13/2013 6:35:33 PM PDT
by
rdcbn
To: Iron Munro
“No intrinsic value”? How can you say that? The best projections are seas will rise a millimeter or two in the next 100 years. We can’t prepare soon enough for the impending disaster.
To: Right Wing Assault
He’s going to build a big slush fund and pay top dollar to Acorn and liberal universities to “study the problem.”
Same thing they did for electric car companies.
7
posted on
07/13/2013 6:39:42 PM PDT
by
volunbeer
(We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
To: Steve Peacock
Shovel-ready Sea Quester.
8
posted on
07/13/2013 6:56:53 PM PDT
by
Zuse
To: Iron Munro
I don’t watch the news. But my wife does. The other night she was watching the news with the POS Brian Williams on, and he does a segment on wasteful spending in Afghanistan...34 million dollars on a building the military isn’t going to ever use. I don’t know how long the segment was on, but it made my blood boil.
THIS was an example of the most wasteful spending. The military. On a building.
I wanted to puke. Liberals spend HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars on absolute CRAP, and THIS was the example they got all huffy about?
THAT is precisely why I don’t watch television generally, or the news specifically.
And now this posted article highlighting REAL BS spending. But people won’t hear about it. They are going to hear about how the military costs too much.
9
posted on
07/13/2013 7:06:54 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Silence: The New Hate Speech)
To: Steve Peacock
how about pumping all that into NOLA? I don’t ever want to hear of that sh&t hole again.
10
posted on
07/13/2013 7:36:14 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(We are in a new Cold War. At home.)
To: Steve Peacock
I’ll take climate change over the communist change this marxist spouts.
11
posted on
07/13/2013 8:15:15 PM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: Steve Peacock
Good God, it never ends...
12
posted on
07/13/2013 8:35:32 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Breaking News: Hillary not running in 2016. Brain tumor found during recent colonoscopy...)
To: Steve Peacock
$650 million? That’s like half of his personal social budget. He must be really serious.
13
posted on
07/13/2013 9:30:23 PM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Steve Peacock
Uhmmmmm...........
Doesn't congress have to appropriate funds?
14
posted on
07/14/2013 5:51:59 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: Steve Peacock
Tell me, O’Dumbo, how much of N.Y. and N.J. are still in shambles after promising to remove the current ‘red tape’ since their natural disaster? FEMA still sitting around their command station with their thumbs up their asses?
15
posted on
07/14/2013 8:18:22 AM PDT
by
i_robot73
(We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
To: Steve Peacock; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
16
posted on
07/14/2013 8:40:03 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(I don't always vote, but when I do, I SURE AS HELL DON'T VOTE DEMOCRAT!)
To: Iron Munro
He just looks for ways to spend money on projects that have no intrinsic value and wont do anything lasting to improve the job market or the out of control spending.
Congress, including the GOP-led House, is more than happy to help him.
To: Steve Peacock
Obama spending $650 million on shorelinesA large portion of which will be dedicated to the shoreline in front of his new home in Hawaii.
18
posted on
07/14/2013 10:27:54 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: blackdog
Congress arguably is equally guilty. But keep in mind that while it weighs & approves/disapproves each fiscal year State & Foreign Operations bill, it does not clear in advance every program. Congress, for instance, says "Yes, we approved [insert amount] dollars for USAID," and perhaps it specifies a few particular programs or issues. But then USAID, State Dept., USTDA, etc., then carries out a multitude of programs that Congress never heard of or simply ignores later on. For instance, how many congressmen would actually support a project to offer "trauma education" and "reflective workshops" to warring tribes and cattle raiders in and around the Kenyan border? (i.e:
"USAID Pushing Kenyan 'Peace' Projects"). No doubt some might say, "Yeah. Good idea." But perhaps if more of these men and women (in Congress that is, not Kenyan couples arguing about the value of reprisal attacks against rivals) actually took the time to look into these things they would not be so quick to write a back check to the White House.
To: stockpirate
“Redistribution, aka stealing, of our nations wealth to supporters of fascism worldwide.”
It is...and we are doing nothing about it.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson