>>but that doesn’t mean that we think he’s RIGHT about it.
1st, it’s pretty laughable that you, a “former Eunuch”, presume to speak for “we” the LCMS.
2nd, where’s the clarifying position paper?
Not on the LCMS.org site.
Put up the position paper so folks WORKING in the field don’t get blind-sided by the issue. Otherwise, buzz off ya flatulent gas bag.
I STILL do not understand why you’re so angry. And why you’ve gone and resorted to even more personal attacks than I leveled at you. Including a rather laughable attempt to bring up a ten-year-old self-description from my teenage self. I should probably change that, but if I did right now, you’d accuse me of having something to hide.
So, how about you try to explain to me how what Luther wrote in the distant past when he was angry has an effect on what the LCMS believes TODAY? Not what the Nazis did (I’ll see your Krystallnacht and raise you one Dietrich Bonhoeffer), but what your problem is NOW.
I have not met a single Lutheran who is an anti-Semite. I’ve not seen a single Missouri Synod church that reads TJaTL and teaches it like it’s the Gospel.
So what’s with you? You obviously hate the Missouri Synod for some reason OTHER than ‘no published paper.’