I do not envy the lawyers and pundits whose bias has been predetermined by various factors and factions. They must appear to support their side of an argument whether or not it is to be believed. The public thinks they’re seeing genuine sincerity but often times, they are not. The media tends to lead people to believe that there is nothing but the greatest sincerity in their role as news and info content providers.
For example, Nancy Grace (HLN/CNN) leans heavily for the prosecution in the State of Florida vs. George Zimmerman case probably because she has too much in common with Paula Deen and knows she needs to avoid being compared to her by any means necessary. Many other cowardly media types appear to be anti-Zimmerman because they fear being labeled as being racist, bigoted, homophobic, etc, etc, etc. They literally cannot afford to be honest.
That’s just one of the ways the public can be misled and unfortunately, not enough people understand who some of those media personalities really are and why they say what they sometimes say.
Brilliant observation.
Take your BP meds, wait for them to kick in, then read this;
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/trashing-trayvon-article-1.1397657
Speaking of HLN, who is that big-mouthed (too many teeth) moronic blondish female blatherer on now (next to the black guy)? Her voice and demeanor is like nails screeching and scraping across a blackboard to me.
I have been watching local Miami coverage of this trial, and I can say the way the media has reported on the Zimmerman case is blatantly biased against him.
Of course, the media here is also in full Obama worship mode 24 hours a day, too...seems they can NEVER find anything wrong he has ever done....whereas they found constant fault with George W Bush.
They will learned it will cost them more being dishonest. The pleasure of sin only last for a time but in the end cost them more than they are willing or able to pay. Its just the way it is.