Skip to comments.
The GOP Is More Serious Than Sarah Palin (Uses Lincoln & Reagan to bash Palin on Amnesty!)
Commentary Magazine ^
| July 8, 2013
| Peter Wehner
Posted on 07/08/2013 12:16:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Timber Rattler
I remember with Fox, the networks said a 4th network wouldn’t survive.
Perrault got 19% of the vote in 92. I believe a Freedom Party ticket would get more votes.
However in saying that, the new moderate party (Republicrat) would get more than the Communist Party vote.
Only question becomes, would the moderates vote republican or democrat now that those evil neocons left the party?
21
posted on
07/08/2013 12:32:53 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; KC_Lion; Lakeshark; stephenjohnbanker; LaybackLenny; leapfrog0202; LibLieSlayer; ...
Sarah Palin's Awesome Ping List
KILL THE BILL
Hammer the phones!
Don't let Up!!!
Never Mind this Stupid Article!
22
posted on
07/08/2013 12:33:49 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
23
posted on
07/08/2013 12:34:30 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: onyx; stephenjohnbanker
Article by Peter Whiner........
24
posted on
07/08/2013 12:35:39 PM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(KILL THE BILL!)
To: tennmountainman
They make talk trash about her, but the GOP elites are scared to
death of Palin. They know Palin has the pulse of the grassroots.
Palin was a darling of the progressives and Republicans and some Democrats when she was confined to cleaning up the mess the good ‘ol boys club made up in alaska.
Then she came within a ballot box and a heart beat away from cleaning up all the corruption in Washington DC and the Establishment crapped a collective brick on her.
This is why after she was nominated many articles that were glowing before changed tone severly overnight, even the ones written by the same people who praised her less than a month ago...
25
posted on
07/08/2013 12:35:44 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: tennmountainman
AND she can successfully siphon away enough votes from them to make them null and void... anytime she wants to!
26
posted on
07/08/2013 12:36:06 PM PDT
by
SMARTY
("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
To: onyx
Never Mind this Stupid Article! Ya made my day, LOLOL!
27
posted on
07/08/2013 12:36:32 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Trey Gowdy......Nuff said.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Only question becomes, would the moderates vote republican or democrat now that those evil neocons left the party?
I think we should go to town halls and convice the rinos to actually switch parties, barring thast, time to start a new party.
28
posted on
07/08/2013 12:36:59 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: onyx
Heavy flak means her targeting is accurate. Bombs away.
29
posted on
07/08/2013 12:38:11 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: The Cajun
LOLOLOL. GOOD!
Well, I sure didn’t read the idiot’s article, didn’t you?
30
posted on
07/08/2013 12:38:36 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: babble-on
>She sure does know how to manipulate the right wing into giving her money.<
Don’t they all?
31
posted on
07/08/2013 12:38:53 PM PDT
by
bimboeruption
(Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
To: TADSLOS
32
posted on
07/08/2013 12:39:01 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: CarmichaelPatriot
We could have open borders, if we didn’t have a welfare state.
We could have a welfare state, if we didn’t have open borders.
Idealy we would have neither.
We can have one or the other, or none, BUT NEVER BOTH!!!!
33
posted on
07/08/2013 12:39:22 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Timber Rattler
Rich Lowry points out that Lincoln was broadly pro-immigration
...because he needed more recruits and conscripts for the Union Army. Wrong, the Civil War had not started when Lincoln promoted immigration. Rather there was tons of land available and Lincoln saw the need to put people there to "civilize" the wilderness. He did not want to remove the Native Americans, he just wanted people filling the land.
And the big difference between then and now (which Gov. Palin recognizes) is Lincoln's immigrants were European, mostly English and German. Today's immigrants are Mexican and South American. They are not looking for land, they are looking for jobs and free benefits. That removes those from the US citizens.
34
posted on
07/08/2013 12:40:05 PM PDT
by
ProudFossil
(" I never did give anyone hell. I just told the truth and they thought it was hell." Harry Truman)
To: Lakeshark; stephenjohnbanker
LOL. Perfect name for the little dolt.
35
posted on
07/08/2013 12:40:10 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: SMARTY
AND she can successfully siphon away enough votes from them to make them null and void... anytime she wants to!
So Sayeth the Whigs circa 1850’s......
36
posted on
07/08/2013 12:40:39 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: onyx
37
posted on
07/08/2013 12:41:21 PM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(KILL THE BILL!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’d say you put her in the appropriate set of minds.
To: The Working Man
Lincoln was also Pro-EMMIGRATION, he wanted to send the freed Blacks back to Africa and I believe the Country of Liberia was to be the destination for them. Possibly. James Monroe started that program in 1820, Liberia's capitol (Monrovia) was named after him in 1847.
39
posted on
07/08/2013 12:42:33 PM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: Timber Rattler
Being "pro-imigration," when the population was only a very small fraction of the present; when we still had an open fronteir, and the bulk of the immigrants were coming from countries far more similar to the original origins of the Americans, is no argument for the present bill--none whatsoever. Lowry is engaged in a dishonest rationalization that discredits him. It is sad how far National Review has fallen. But his comment cannot stand the light of analysis.
For its part, Reagan's amnesty was intended to be a one shot resolution of a far less extreme problem.
That these people are so dishonest is a sobering reality. The field of those worthy of the public trust keeps imploding. We have to answer these people in ways that expose their ethical malfunctioning. If their behavior be not treasonous, it is at least the "kissing cousin."
If they want to debate this, fine! Let them address the real issues, not offer absurd rationalization.
See Immigration & The American Future.
William Flax
40
posted on
07/08/2013 12:42:38 PM PDT
by
Ohioan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson