Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge

In order to put in a clean code section, one that would protect every single person, from conception, it was necessary to go in and strike large sections of anti-personhood, anti-equality language that has been put there by the “pro-life” “Republicans” over the course of many years.

Telling, that...


38 posted on 07/07/2013 7:41:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

Your way has been tried before. It didn’t work. So what do you do? Do you keep trying something that didn’t work?

Do you stop what you are doing and wait for favourable winds?

Or do you get cracking and get to work with what we have today?

I hear you. The legislation is not ideal. Absolutely I agree with you here. However, it is an opportunity to reach out to a whole horde of hurting people who believe that abortion is their best option. We can reach out to these folks and convince them of the absolute truth that the unborn is a human person.

Some will not turn. Some will. I was one of those folks 10 years ago when someone shoved graphic pictures in my face and showed me the truth about abortion. And I try to do what I can, *today* to go save some babies.

I am going to be sitting out on the legislature steps all day tomorrow. And hopefully helping out on Tuesday and on Wednesday. Why? Because I believe this bill will save babies. Today. Not some far off time when the winds are favourable. Today.


41 posted on 07/07/2013 7:46:07 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson