Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

As someone educated in Western American history: arrgghh.

This author is all over the map, cherry picking weird theories while omitting immense amounts of data. He could probably argue that the 20th Century wasn’t violent at all, except for Wilson, “Ol’ Frank” Roosevelt, and Nixon.

After finding the biography of Thomas J. DiLorenzo, much is clarified. He is an economist, not a historian, and he is a kook. He has no idea of what he is talking about.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_J._DiLorenzo


6 posted on 07/06/2013 4:12:05 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
I read your wicki, and I don't see the kook.

Lot'a paper validating him, though

8 posted on 07/06/2013 4:26:09 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
I agree. Quoting Dee Brown? He didn't have chip on his shoulder did he? The author needs to read books published in the early 19th Century such as Wither's Chronicles of Border Warfare to get a better grasp of the early Indian Wars.
20 posted on 07/06/2013 6:24:27 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson