Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: desertfreedom765
desertfreedom76: "But after Harper’s Ferry the South was determined on War.
At that point it wasn’t just about slavery, but John Brown was trying to cause a slave revolt and get a lot of people killed."

Sure, and I might have some sympathy for that point of view, except that John Brown was defeated and captured -- by US Army Colonel Robert E Lee, no less -- then tried and hanged for treason, a fate that Confederate General Lee himself notably did not suffer.

Point is: in 1859 from a Southern perspective justice was done by the Federal Government, and there had been no slave revolt.

So how does that become justification for secession?

92 posted on 07/06/2013 1:51:08 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

“So how does that become justification for secession?”

From my point of view it doesn’t.

But I do understand human nature.

Dred Scott enraged the North and Harper’s Ferry enraged the South. They were the final straws so to speak.

I was just pointing out the Truth.


103 posted on 07/06/2013 2:39:37 PM PDT by desertfreedom765
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson