Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x

“the bearded ideological wild man the other one is”

Yep, that was the one I was cautioning about. He is a self-identified paleo Conservative (ie. he thinks that Monarchy is an acceptable form of government. [barf])

I have my own take on the slavery issue. We were once a nation divide, with slave states and free states. We fought a bloody war to resolve (sort of) that. That slavery was race based. Today we are again a nation divided, with slave states and free states. But this time the slavery I speak of is “Universal” slavery to the State. Universal Slavery to the State is a return to the condition that the American Revolution sprang from. Will it require a war to resolve that? This is not sarcasm, it is a real divide. Lets pray that it can be resolved without a blood bath.


53 posted on 07/06/2013 10:30:04 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Fossil

I don’t see how slavery in ‘65 was worse than the slavery today under Wilson in ‘13.

At least one side understood that what they were doing is morally wrong.


63 posted on 07/06/2013 11:37:31 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson