Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two more female officers fail in Marines’ infantry course
The Washington Times ^ | July 3, 2013 | Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 07/03/2013 9:46:38 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: jazusamo

“It’s good the Marine Corps is sticking to its standards, hopefully Obama and Jarrett won’t look for new commanders. “

You’re joking, right?


41 posted on 07/03/2013 10:41:08 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Yes,I should have qualified that, but fortunately you understood:) I’m not at all knocking the good men and women who joined to serve, my brother is a vet, my husband is a Vietnam vet, my father was a vet.


42 posted on 07/03/2013 10:45:25 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BRK

Now that, I have to say, is disgusting, and a slur on all the people who actually did pass.


43 posted on 07/03/2013 10:46:53 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The Pentagon last winter lifted the ban on women in such jobs, but it has opted to conduct two years of study on how sex-integration would work for infantry, armor and special operations.

I've got a great idea for Marine leadership: when the two years of study are nearly complete, announce a one-year extension for "further study".

They'd be merely following the precedent set by the year's delay on the employer mandates for Obamacare.

44 posted on 07/03/2013 10:48:16 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
I’m shocked, shocked to learn that men and women are not physically the same!!!

It has been many years; but, I do remember an Army test of strength and the results were that the most fit woman was not as fit as the least fit man. Men just have more muscle than women. That is not bias, it is physiology.

45 posted on 07/03/2013 10:56:42 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Secret Agent Man

Yep.

They expressed a desire to get there and qualified.

They have to earn the rest and that is largely dependent on a mindset.

Sometimes, your body just doesn’t make it or it overpowers your mind and you quit. You quit a course, where everyday they are asking for recruits to join the ranks of others who have done so before.

You are even told “There is no shame in quitting!”.

If you allow your mind to say “Really? No shame? I am so freaking tired and hamstrings are killing me. Maybe I try this another time”.

Ring, Ring, Ring.

Some regret ringing that bell later, realizing they allowed their mind to be lulled into accepting someone else’s suggestion that “This one time will be okay..”

Still, others realize “This is more than I thought and I’m in fantastic shape. But, I’m not going to jeopardize another man’s life. I’ll find greatness elsewhere”.

Life’s tough. It’s always tough. In fact, it’s tough everyday.

It’s a great life if you don’t weaken....


46 posted on 07/03/2013 11:07:42 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

what sort of comment is that you posted....are you sick or living in your mom’s basement....get real....if you are a male then get the your T tested, and if a female get your T tested....such nonsense


47 posted on 07/03/2013 11:23:11 AM PDT by B212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: B212

I think that was sarcasm.


48 posted on 07/03/2013 11:31:40 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank

“This fetishistic obsession to place women into combat roles makes me marvel as to how the USMC ever managed that 80 mile withdrawal from Hagaru-Ri at the Chosin Resovoir to the port of Hungnam without women infantry.”

Great point. That 80 mile withdrawal was during the depths of a bitterly cold winter. Had any significant part of 1st Marine Division been comprised of female soldiers, the entire unit would have been cut to pieces.

I doubt 101st Airborne could have held Bastonge under similar circumstances. How many women would have survived the Bataan Death March? Or the ensuing captivity? Speaking of which, what do you suppose would typically happen to women POW’s?

Even though the Soviets used women in some combat roles during the Great Patriotic War, they were limited to the occaisional sniper or SMERSH officer. The Red Army never had women in the regular line infantry or armor units.


49 posted on 07/03/2013 11:54:23 AM PDT by henkster (The 0bama regime isn't a train wreck, it's a B 17 raid on the rail yard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

True that. Just in the interest of ‘fairness’ ....


50 posted on 07/03/2013 11:57:17 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: B212

Think you might have misunderstood my post. I was agreeing with the guy I was replying to, and expanding his point. I didn’t put a /sarc tag on the “reality” part.


51 posted on 07/03/2013 11:57:25 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

whose reality? YGTBSM


52 posted on 07/03/2013 11:59:15 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

oh, I missed the /s tag.....


53 posted on 07/03/2013 12:00:10 PM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

I DIDN’T PUT A SARC TAG ON IT - think about it


54 posted on 07/03/2013 12:01:05 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
"Hey, here's a solution..tubal ligation...vasectomy."

Great idea. After all, we certainly don't want the few warriors we have left to reproduce.

55 posted on 07/03/2013 12:12:11 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I guess...I heard the Marines were full on board with the celebration of open sodomites in the ranks, though. Kind of disturbing.


56 posted on 07/03/2013 12:23:23 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
Don’t military leaders say that diversity is the most important target, or something to that effect?

I would think that unit cohesiveness and diversity are polar opposites. If I had to choose which group I'd trust in battle it would be the cohesive unit hands down. Military operations do not lend themselves to democracy, debate, or individualism. Diversity is the antithesis of "The Big Green Machine" and will prove to be the enemy of discipline. Without discipline the military cannot function effectively.

After WWII the German Wehrmacht (means/power of resistance) was dissolved and in November of 1955 was superseded by the Bundeswehr (Federal Defense). One of the unusual founding principles of the Bundeswehr was that NCOs were to discuss orders with the troops and to hold a vote to determine if the troops thought the orders were legal and should be issued and obeyed. This proved to be too cumbersome to follow in practice and has been abandoned.

Regards,
GtG

57 posted on 07/03/2013 3:13:44 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Those standards sound sexist, maybe even racist, definitely intolerant.


58 posted on 07/03/2013 3:19:02 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Biden '13. Impeach now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

ALL citizens, including women; should be prepared to defend their nation WHEN NECESSARY say due to the sort of hideous attrition that the Soviets suffered in WWII. But you dont send the scrub team to engage the enemy FIRST.

If I had my druthers, I would restrict large percentages of women in the armed forces for instances of full scale mobilization. But todays PC world has set that ship adrift, not just out to sail.

When do you think the cultural marxists will formally institute the position of Gender/Sexual Orientation Commissar at every unit level? I fear it is being prepared right now.


59 posted on 07/03/2013 5:38:55 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Buy ‘em a beer for the ‘good try’ and toast their health.


60 posted on 07/03/2013 9:33:27 PM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (Any law repugnant to the Constitutuon is null and void.....ENFORCE THE BILL OF RIGHTS! It's the Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson