Posted on 07/02/2013 5:45:20 AM PDT by massmike
Strange how the same didn’t apply to the priests who did the same acts?.
Agreed.
This ruling is a disgrace that suspiciously smacks of a self-serving conflict of interest of a homo-friendly judiciary.
Have you any knowledge on just how long this particular NY law and statute of limitation has been in effect? Was it enacted by the NY's state legislature or as an EO by a Governor?
Oh yes, I agree. I do not like that limitation though, I think it should be removed.
Sometimes it takes victims of such crimes time to muster the courage needed.
I personally do not have any knowledge of the limitation. I do believe that the limitation should be removed. It seems that such a limitation only serves to help the perp and not the victim, and that does not seem right to me.
I assume you’re talking about one state’s change of limitations as to priests only. Limitations for crimes charged under state law are governed by that state’s law. If a state’s legislative body chooses to lift the statute of limitations and apply it retroactively, while it certainly smacks of ex post facto, that then becomes the law.
As I stated the law is only for the few.
What is the law on the statute of limitations for molestation/sexual abuse?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Apparently the length of time is directly proportional to the perp’s distance from the Liberal agenda.
Not sure how that tracks with my explanation...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.