The less public input the better, dont you think? she asked sarcastically.
Is that analogous to nine unelected Justices, without Constitutional authority, throwing out statutes in all 50 states and writing their own, after discussing it strictly among themselves, resulting in 50 million or so murders to date?
Good for Iowa.
In a state that won’t even allow midwives to help deliver healthy babies to healthy mothers at home, because supposedly it presents some sort of health hazard. Madness.
One of those things I doubt most people realize goes on. It was banned in Michigan late last year.
Telemedicine RU-486 prescriptions.
What's next, remote control D&C's?
I wonder how much this system actually gets used.
A big factor in the decision to get pregnant with a baby one does not want is the ease of access to abortion mills. I would think that women in rural areas where there are no convenient abortion mills would be a lot more likely to avoid pregnancy.
I can’t say I’m overly concerned with the health of those using remote abortion services. However, I would be curious as to how the death and complication rate compares between tele-abortion and on-site abortion. I’d want to say that the tele-abortion would have more complications, because there is no medical staff on hand to handle them... but the same can be said about most abortion mills.