Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

If they actually were to take a vote on the senate bill, and only the senate bill I think it would not pass, and that would be fine by me. It’s if they vote on one that sounds better, then go to conference with senate on it that we’ll get screwed. If you call your congresscritter, and I suggest you do, that’s the worst thing they can do: Pretend they are making a “better bill”, then getting screwed in the reconciliation conference.


24 posted on 07/01/2013 3:13:03 PM PDT by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark
If they actually were to take a vote on the senate bill, and only the senate bill I think it would not pass, and that would be fine by me. It’s if they vote on one that sounds better, then go to conference with senate on it that we’ll get screwed. If you call your congresscritter, and I suggest you do, that’s the worst thing they can do: Pretend they are making a “better bill”, then getting screwed in the reconciliation conference.

I have the same concern, but remember that Boehner brought up the senate VAWA bill and it passed rhe House with Dems and a cowardly RINOs.

Anyway, the House Judiciary Committee is well into creating its own "comprehensive immigration" bill and has already passed 2 chunks of it.

25 posted on 07/01/2013 3:23:05 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson