Posted on 06/29/2013 1:49:21 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
What’s wrong with LEGAL IMMIGRATION?
Nothing except we currently have an unemployment rate of nine percent and one of the lowest labor participation rates since the 1930s........and we need a larger labor pool?
Damn.....just DAMN!
Its not E Pluribus Unum.
Its E Pluribus Unum Mexico
Out of many, one united Mexico
Im not buying in you ignorant bastard
Previous generations came to the US to assimilate into our country and they did wish to make themselves a burden on Americans so they pulled their weight.
The latest generation comes here illegally, has anchor babies at taxpayer expense so they can stay, enroll in welfare (often several times under several fake identities) and then agitate against America.
Its not E Pluribus Unum.
It's the Reconquista and Por La Raza todo, Fuera de La Raza nada,” meaning For the Race everything, outside the Race nothing.
This ain't your Grandfather's immigration
There's one more.
Rube-OUT !
What he says is meaningless.
Yes, I agree.
I believe you meant to say, “...and they did NOT wish...”
I agree with that specifically.
Out of many, one... true. And the “many” who come here from THEIR countries and wish to live her, need to become citizens and be allowed to come here. Our history of immigration up until post ww2 was one of definitive process for legal immigration, learning of our language (english) and our history and laws.
Such that the legal immigrants definitely do NOT appreciate amnesty with “fining fees” and green cards as the means of doing this. Note that NOWHERE in the “reform” bill is the requirement to learn english, or go through our naturalization processes. Nowhere. This article is a sham, and a sop to those who stand to make millions bilking the illegals even as the illegals rip us off and send their remittances home, and get their healthcare off our backs. No sir.
Rubin a conservative uh,huh. The propaganda wing of the Romney campaign now working for romneybot- rubio. Fruit of the poisoned tree.
And here is a quote from the comments section:
“Would you be willing to explain why the quotes from Rubio’s speech in your blog yesterday do not match the actual speech he gave?
Were you given an advance copy of the speech which you just copied and pasted into the document? Because when you type that Rubio “said” something, we would expect that it would actually be something that he said... “
Because, the speech did not match the blog pre-view. This is what PR people do all the time. Jive.
It’s OK Diogenes— we must all continue to search for an honest man. Plato was famous for .... platitudes and descriptions... like that man was a featherless biped. To which Diogenes replied by bringing a plucked chicken to Plato and said “behold, I bring you a man”.
Rubio walked and talked and looked like a duck (conservative) on the immigration. He was and is a schill for much more powerful money interests and the globalists. To be expected from a romneybot. In and of itself, it is difficult to see how someone can philosophically or theologically make the switch from Catholic to mormon and back to Catholic and not be doing so for facile political reasons. He has lot’s of ‘splaining to do.
The concept of out of many, one was not from the many countries or ethnic populations— never was conceived that way. While a nice way to think of the goal of legal immigration, the Latin was to describe we were/are a unity of States. With each State having their own rights and ways of doing things.
We do not have that currently. But it is easily gotten when one leaves the purported union.
Indeed the la raza crowd goes further than just “Mexico” the country regaining “stolen” land. It is far more than a re-visitation of the goals of Santa Anna (the Napoleon of the West) who was an emperor of Mexico.
No, now the raza people want it to be only for the indigenous peoples of Mexico in a new country amalgam with OUR lands, re-named Aztlan. Seriously.
True. Amnesty is just a campaign in the Aztlan conquest plan. There is much more at stake. Enter the UN and the anti-colonialists to set things “right”.
It is easy for those in their ivory towers to be moved by this kind of thing; the rest of us are living amongst the masses, some good, some bad. The rest of us see it and live it, the ivory tower people are sheltered and playing their little games of chess.
“Jennifer Rubin has always been in the pocket of the GOPe. She does not like tea partiers, either, believe me.”
Bingo. She’ll believe anything the party bosses tell her. Even when that changes from week to week.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.