Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; Perdogg; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; randita

“It’s a safe seat yes? Let them shoot.”


If we’re talking about two GOP candidates, sure, let them fight it out. But remember California’s retarded (and IMHO unconstitutional) jungle primary syatem: if there are three Republicans running, and two Democrats run, we really need to narrow it to two Republicans prior to the jungle primary so as to avoid the possibility of two Democrats splitting 42% and finishing first and second, thus keeping the GOP out of the general election. That’s how Republican Gary Miller was able to hold the CA-31 even though Romney only got 40% there—three or four RATs split the vote and Miller and another Republican finished first and second. So we have to be careful not to commit a similar mistake.


18 posted on 07/01/2013 6:16:39 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

Right, right.

I really hate that cause it makes me want to support having the party anoint candidates in every seat and ostracize anyone else who dares to run as a Republican. And that’s very undemocratic.


23 posted on 07/01/2013 11:44:46 PM PDT by Impy (Bring back the spoils system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson