Posted on 06/27/2013 11:47:14 AM PDT by Mozilla
“Serenity Now!” means “insanity later,” George...
I guess I just don’t understand how people like to have sex makes them a class - its a choice regardless of what people say - they aren’t born that way.
I don’t sanction polygamy either - just saying if I had my choice between the two.
I’m waiting for a gay couple to attempt to have their “marriage” “sealed” in a mormon temple.
"The series is informative, thanks to discussions about the group's specific faith-based doctrines about baptism, death, and of course, plural marriage. It also reveals some of the patriarchal community's interesting history and cultural traditions, like practicing placement marriage (marrying someone you barely know), expecting women to prepare for and find/choose the man they will wed, and mentoring the young priested (ordained) work missionaries of the community while they wait for a woman to choose them. But the show also underscores their beliefs about having the right to practice the lifestyle that they choose to live, which continues to be illegal in all 50 states."
The incomprehensible ruling by the majority makes a "class" out of anyone not covered by any law; not just DOMA. For example: You have a Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. By the logic of the court, if you are a felon denied the use of firearms, you are now a "class" singled out for "discrimination" by your State, because everyone else is allowed to own guns and you aren't.
That’s the “beauty” of kennedy’s insane decision - anyone opposed to polygamy, beastiality, or any other perversion is by his definition a “hater”.
Anything goes...
Well the Arabs want 72 virgins. So they should support polygamy.
I think polygamy is bad for culture but i find heterosexual polygamist sexual relations far less repulsive than male homosexual fisting and fecal orifice affections both orally and phallic wise
and so forth
not to mention all the gender confusion with queers
At least polygamy has a world history of being recognized as marriage. Queerness does not.
...AND I hate polygamy, being a product of many polygamous unions in my genealogy notwithstanding.
I don’t doubt you are right. The moral collapse of our country is accelerating exponentially.
Lol.
Anything, indeed, goes.
Polygamy and homosexuality go together like flies and maggots. Multiple wives for some men means lots of other men with nowhere to turn but each other. Feel the looooooooove ....
I can understand why the Natureists ignore the religious implications but not the fact that it defies nature, too.
The act is designed to produce children. There is absolutely no way an child can be produced “that way.” There are also health and saftey issues that people tend to ingore because of their political motivations.
I doubt anyone alive today is not somewhere in their background not a product of polygamy, slavery or rape
That last point is something I’ve been wanting to ask a very pro-homo libinlaw doctor about -
Say, would you advise a patient that male homosexual sex was medically indicated or contraindicated for a long healthy life?
Yup. Slippery slope...
My polygamy is on both my mother and father’s side and only back three generations. I’ve lived with the ramifications.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.