As usual with these ambiguous headlines regarding court rulings, I’m not sure if this is good news or not.
The article does not fully explain this ruling. Can TX require a voter ID, or not?
Really, does anyone respect the supremes any more.
And when are we going to “just say no”?
Really.
“Barack Obama has made his decision; now let him enforce it!”.
Hum? I must need more coffee, because I still do not know if Texas can require ID to vote.
Is the article really that unclear?
My understanding: A lower court had halted the Texas ID law on the grounds it conflicted with the Voter’s Right Act. Since the Supreme Court threw out the Voter’s Right Act (or the list of states covered by it, which resulted in the same outcome). The lower court ruling was not moot, so it was dismissed as well. Result - Voter ID law goes into effect in Texas.
Dems were celibrated the SCOTUS ruling to advance state sponsored perversion big time last night, but having all those red states now advance their voter ID laws at the same time is ruining it for them.
Yeah, It's Discriminatory!
But Only Against Cheaters!!!
Lone Star State.
More prophetic than catchy.
High court preserves Texas voter ID rules.
Mais non?
I received this yesterday morning from Mississippi Secretary of Delbert Hosemann.
“The process for implementation of Constitutional Voter Identification begins today. It will be conducted in accordance with the Constitutional Amendment adopted by the electorate, funded by the Legislature, and regulations as proposed by the Secretary of State.
Secretary of State, Delbert Hosemann
The Voter ID laws in Texas and Mississippi were like laws passed and in effect in other states but were held up by the DOJ because they were enabled to by the civil rights law of 1966? that gave them the authority to hold up or kill any state legislation that they wanted to in Southern states. The DOJ would have held it up in Indiana if they could have. The DOJ is FOR democrats stealing votes. Our Secretary of State says election fraud is 5 to 6% of the vote, this makes my vote count as .95% or less of a vote. I want one legal voter, one legal vote. If we win a close election it means we beat them by 6+% of the vote.