To: BarnacleCenturion
To: Bulldaddy
Good article. There were many after the health care decision who tried to say it wasn’t what it was. That somehow it was brilliant...that somehow it was a win. These are losses, pure and simple.
34 posted on
06/27/2013 5:57:57 AM PDT by
Girlene
To: Bulldaddy
As Scalia suggested, that opinion can now become the predicate for challenges to the laws on marriage in all of the States. A couple of the same sex need merely go into a federal court and invoke Justice Kennedys opinion in the DOMA case (U.S. v. Windsor): The Supreme Court has declared now that a law that refuses to recognize same-sex marriage is animated by a passion to demean and denigrate. Any such law cannot find a rational ground of justification. As Kennedy had famously said in Romer v. Evans, those kinds of laws can be explained only in terms of an irrational animus.Worse Than it Sounds - Hadley Arkes National Review Online
I think Roe vs. Wade can be explained only in terms of an irriational animus toward babies. It demeans and denigrates them. Therefore it is unconstitutional.
So there.
51 posted on
06/27/2013 7:42:30 AM PDT by
boxlunch
(Psalm 2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson