Much better (yeah, irony, I know) to call your Congress-critter; they could have told the courts ‘here’s what you cannot touch’. Instead we get the shrug and palms up (as usual) ‘I tried’ BS
They are also the ones who allowed these jack-wagons onto the Court to begin. Here’s an idea, if their past doesn’t show them supporting the Constitution, don’t allow them on the bench!
But, that’s expecting Congress to do its job
An excellent point.
Precedent exists, and it's settled law. Of course the elected morons are not smart enough to do this, nor is it in "their personal interests" to approach the problem.
That would be the easy solution, but we shouldn't hold our collective breaths.
This also raises a fundamental and critical question : Does Congress (both houses) have an official attorney to advise them of what their powers and limitations are? Including legal precedents?
If not they certainly should, and it should not be the Attorney General.
Do we need further explanation why?
That the office is not only susceptible to criminal abuse (with no recourse,) but as we are experiencing now, is subject to claims of ignorance by the administrators when caught red-handed in felonious, jail-time criminal abuse.