Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawgg

Of course the SCROTUS said that equal protection applies, but they are as stupid and perverted as you are.

Just because someone likes to commit sodomy doesn’t make him a member of a class of people that deserve “equal protection” under the law solely because they like to commit sodomy.

Next up - pedophiles, bestiality afficianos, necrophiliacs, and incest practitioners.

I’m finished with you. I’d rather clean up catcrap that debate with knaves.


145 posted on 06/26/2013 10:45:04 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
"Of course the SCROTUS said that equal protection applies"

Yes amazing isn't it. The Fedgov gives monetary consideration based on marital status and then everyone is surprised that SCOTUS uses the Equal Protection clause to rule on the issue.

Its like being astonished that when you stick your hand in the fire you get burned.

Now here is the question. "If the Fedgov hand not tried to Social Engineer Matrimony by giving monetary consideration based on such and stayed out of the issue entirely would the Sodomites been able to lobby SCOTUS and get a ruling for equal protection under the law?

And there is the meat of the matter. There would have been no issue. Nothing for SCOTUS to rule on, no legal issue to adjudicate.

QED

147 posted on 06/27/2013 1:57:44 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson