Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: campaignPete R-CT

[[The practical impact of dismissing the Prop. 8 case is limited.]]

I strongly dissagree- the fact is that the supreme court once again said the peopel do NOT have a voice- that they aren’t ‘qualified’ to bring propositions to vote- and what the supreme court did by punting hte ball was to indicate that down the road NO state will be able to ‘discriminate against people’s sexual preferecnes’, and anyoen that ries will be rueld agaisnt as hateful- The immoral gay comunity hjas won a major victory because now they get to scream bloody murder everytiem they feel they are ‘discriminated agaisnt’ in ANY state, and they WILL garner sympathy fro mthe courts eventually (of course the moral majority will not be able to claim they are beign discriminated agaisnt by the gay comunity- only the gay community is allowed to scream about discrimination)

[[“We have no authority to decide this case on the merits, and neither did the 9th Circuit,” Roberts said, referring to the federal appeals court that also struck down Proposition 8.]]

Hmmm- so apparently courts have no authority to hear ANY case in which a defendent refuses to show up then- great-


79 posted on 06/26/2013 11:15:26 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

I strongly dissagree ... which a defendent refuses to show up then- great-”

I guess you dissagree with Scalia, writing in the majority. And I dissagree with you.


84 posted on 06/26/2013 11:22:43 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson