Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

Feasible? How CONSTITUTIONAL are they to begin with?! Broke Ponzi schemes..IE: NO MORE $$$. The Fed. is already into hock by $110TRILLION+ (unfunded liabilities = broken promises). Suck it up buttercup, there’s no $$ there.

Damn, it’s sad to see the bashing of (L) already in this thread but when a ‘conservative’ spouts this....nary a peep from the same people.

The ruling is correct. Get gov’t out of the marriage biz; it has NO right to define marriage, but it does for Civil Unions (like any other contract)


214 posted on 06/26/2013 8:29:40 AM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

“The ruling is correct. Get gov’t out of the marriage biz; it has NO right to define marriage, but it does for Civil Unions (like any other contract)”

Agreed.

So then the question is what civil union contracts are allowed? Polygamous? Incestuous?


225 posted on 06/26/2013 8:36:33 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson