Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise
That’s what the liberal activists tried to claim when Rick Santorum spoke of the “slippery slope” in the wake of the Supreme Court decision protecting homosexuality as an afflicted behavior.


177 posted on 06/26/2013 8:10:10 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross

Talk of group marriage was much more chic in the 1970s than it is today. Group marriage isn’t simply polygamy (one man with several wives).

Can’t let the secret out the bag too soon. The sex positive proponents want to get their ducks in a row first.

The goal ultimately is to smash monogamy and smash the patriarchy. Feminists and The Weather Underground were quite open about that in the 1970s. Those same libs are still out there pushing the same anti-West agenda items.

Reflect on that when they ask “but how does this hurt YOUR marriage?”


189 posted on 06/26/2013 8:17:07 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross
"That’s what the liberal activists tried to claim when Rick Santorum spoke of the “slippery slope” in the wake of the Supreme Court decision protecting homosexuality as an afflicted behavior.

"

That's correct! [1] [2]

323 posted on 06/26/2013 11:46:03 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson