>I don’t hear him crying “rape!”<
And neither does the young lady that was sweet-talked into a compromising position. No actual physical compelling force was used, the participant was in agreement to a point WAY beyond going back, and while there is the feeling of being cheap and used the following day, still it APPEARED to be with consent. Is crying “Rape!” meaningful then?
Or do you not see the conundrum here?
no, it’s too sublime for me. in your example, there is no victim, only a consenting individual.
The part you left out of your analogy is that the young lady in question was already a whore. She was not sweet talked, she was a willing partner fully expecting to get her price — amnesty for illegals, out of the deal.
Rubio was always pro amnesty. He lied every time he said he wasn’t.