Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/25/2013 3:57:11 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: raptor22

FUBO!!


2 posted on 06/25/2013 3:58:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
How's that "reset" button working out, Mr. President?

Just fine for him given his puppet masters' goal of wrecking America. For the nation? Not so well...

3 posted on 06/25/2013 4:23:53 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

While we fill up our military with a bunch of fags and dykes.


4 posted on 06/25/2013 4:26:51 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


6 posted on 06/25/2013 4:40:50 PM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

So this is a bit of a strange situation for a strange treaty. The INF bans missiles above and BELOW a certain range, if they’re land-based; the treaty was specifically designed to get rid of the Soviet SS-20s and the US Pershing IIs and Ground-based cruise missiles in the 1980s in Europe.

There isn’t much motivation for the US to complain loudly about it because the RS-26 (seems it may actually be called the Rubezh, not the Yars-M) is NOT intended for use against the US at all - an INF-violating missile can’t reach the US from Russian Silo fields.

The missile is intended to be aimed at the Chinese (who are, of course, not subject to the INF). The more resources the Russians devote towards this missile, and the more nuclear warheads they put on it, the less the US is in danger.

One advantage, if the Russians withdraw first from the INF making it easy for us to withdraw, is that land based conventional prompt strike missiles become an legal option for us.


7 posted on 06/25/2013 4:54:02 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson