Posted on 06/25/2013 1:49:13 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
...data show that sea levels are on the rise at an accelerating rate.
And the peer review should not be incestuous or round robin, as is common with MMGW papers.
Liberals only want to fight wars with imaginary enemies - like Global Warming.
At great cost they are prepared to combat rising sea levels that never actually rise.
And they have already put into place plans to tax us into oblivion, fighting soaring temperatures that manage to stubbornly never actually increase.
But it’s not fair to judge liberals using outmoded metrics like actual results.
They should be judged on the goodness of their intent and the amount of treasure and energy they expend accomplishing nothing.
/sarcasm off
And the peer review should not be incestuous or round robin, as is common with MMGW papers.
This is how to protect cities from sea based threats. I think Al Gore watched this, and thought it was a documentary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFAkrNL2Hjo&t=0m30s
Brilliant!
Can I steal that for use on other postings?
not sure what role the internal combustion engine played in it, but florida was mostly under water once.
Sure glad those glaciers melted.
so why don’t glasses with ice and water not overflow?
where is all this water going to “appear” from?
LAND ice ... if Greenland and Antarctica were to melt, sea levels would rise catastrophically.
If ...
Continental glaciers on Antarctica and Greenland.
Assuming that the models are correct (and they aren’t), and the coastal regions are looking at a one-meter rise in sea levels over a period of ONE HUNDRED YEARS, what is the problem exactly?
That’s one inch every 2.5 years. Any civilization that can’t deal with that deserves to perish.
Yeah, my thoughts as well. Show us the data, not the models. As far as I can tell, the sea level is rising at a rate that might threaten a coastal city like NYC in a millenia or two.
How about an indestructible Tower to Heaven?
Well, at some times in the past, large parts of the country were under water and at other times they were under ice. So they think the having NYC on dry land is the “right” way? Says who?
Let’s say they build a great huge seawall along the major coastal cities. When it’s finished, NYC and DC will probably be effectively decommissioned by an EMP.
I thought I read somewhere else that the Atlantic may disappear due to cracks in the oceanic floor. So just maybe all this ice melting will offset the lost water that gets drained out through those cracks.
This means the left should be cheering global warming! Just think of the jobs! Moving or reinforcing New York to survive the rapidly rising oceans? Think of it as a massive stimulus program!
I’ve seen diagrams showing the successively wider Manhattan coastline over the past couple of centuries....I think the sea has more to fear from Manhattan than Manhattan has to fear from the sea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.